Re: Vacuum deadlocks? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From eric soroos
Subject Re: Vacuum deadlocks?
Date
Msg-id 124755539.1169930075@[4.42.179.151]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum deadlocks?  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum deadlocks?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-novice
Thanks Josh.

> I think there were some issues with VACUUM on 7.2.1.   Were I you, the
> first thing I would try is an upgrade to 7.2.3, which will also fix
> some serious security issues and at least one backup/restore issue.
>  Maybe someone else on the list will speak to your specific issue, or
> you can look at the release notes for 7.2.2 and 7.2.3.

Great. The packager's site is down. (I knew there was a reason for that nagging feeling that I should be building from
sourceinstead of using a package. ) 

> Second, were you aware that you have the option of running a regular
> VACUUM or VACUUM <table-name> from a database connection without
> locking users out of the database?   In high-transaction environments,
> I can run these every 5 -15 minutes.  The vacuumdb commmand-line
> utility, I believe, does a VACUUM FULL which exclusively locks the
> database (and you do need to do periodically, just not frequently).

I looked at the docs and didn't see the mention that vacuumdb did a vacuum full. That would certainly explain the
deadlocking. 

But it seems that that is not the case.

from the 7.2.1 docs:

-f  Perform "full" vacuuming.
-a  Vacuum all databases.

..

vacuumdb is a shell script wrapper around the backend command VACUUM via the PostgreSQL interactive terminal psql.
Thereis no effective difference between vacuuming databases via this or other methods. 

eric




pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Josh Berkus"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum deadlocks?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum deadlocks?